Follow @DuelingChaps
Star Trek: Into Darkness
Release Date: May 17, 2013
Reviewed: June 14, 2013, 11:31 p.m.
Star Trek: Into Darkness image "Set your phasers to stun. It's a safety issue."
Get Lasik.
Many Bothans Died to Bring You This Information
By: Christian Treubig
Star Trek: Into Darkness image
”This is not the movie you’re looking for.”

Ever since I was a schoolboy, I have been a hopeless Star Trek fan. I even coined the term “Trekkie” (feel free to use that one) to label myself and my star-gazing brethren. As an older man now, just seeing “Star Trek” on the theater marquee is more than enough to make me nostalgic for the glory days…

I can still remember the rage that boiled inside me after the senseless destruction of Alderaan. Why, Darth? What were you trying to prove? Did you really think Leia would reveal the true location of the rebel base? And don’t think I’m letting Grand Moff Tarkin off the hook. He had earned Vader’s good graces and may have been the only one who could talk sense into him before he unleashed the Death Star. I can still hear the millions of terrified screams, just as Obi-Wan felt them reverberate through the Force.

That being said, Star Trek: Into Darkness certainly does not stay true to the sci-fi franchise that made us want to travel to a galaxy far, far away. When it became clear in the first ten minutes that none of my favorite characters would be returning (no Chewey?!?!?!), I finally halted my very audible barrage of complaints that was beginning to get on the nerves of the elf-ear wearing fat couple sitting next to me in the theater.

The film takes place in the twenty-third century, and things are going swimmingly on Earth. Humanity has finally recovered from the disastrous Bush-Cheney-Hot Hot Heat era, and our metropolises are now dotted with super-sleek skyscrapers that dwarf the twentieth century crop. How we were able to build such wondrous cities is beyond me however, given the species’ general demeanor on display in the movie.

Captain Kirk is portrayed by Chris Pine, whose lips remain incredibly soft and kissable throughout. Kirk is young and brash, too cool for school and, get this, doesn’t play by the rules. Pretty much everyone else wants to, however, and this creates the movie’s biggest problem. Every statement muttered by Kirk is met with a “But we can’t [action here]” from whomever he’s speaking with. The two occurrences of a character exclaiming “eye, eye, Captain” will catch you off guard. The lack of give-and-take in the relationships extends to everyone, and yet we’re meant to believe that every human and humanoid alien has come together in peaceful harmony on Earth. That doesn’t seem plausible when everybody treats their fellow man as if they’re in a bad marriage with one another.

So the dialogue is lacking, and has every hallmark of a rushed sequel, writing-by-committee situation. The constant bickering would make the thing unwatchable if it weren’t for the very good acting, excellent at times in fact. The best performance, by a mile even in this very competent cast, comes from Benedict Cumberbatch (also an excellent name for a West Virginia Mountaineers outside linebacker). He portrays John Harrison, a rogue Starfleet operative implicated in the bombing of the group’s London base. Kirk is charged with tracking Harrison down with kill-on-site orders, once his location is discovered to be the homeworld of an alien race named after a fabric softener.

John Harrison is a rarity for action films: a brute-force-based villain would make you shake in your shoes regardless of their apparent physical dominance. He’s the human version of the Terminator, whose apathy towards others is not rooted in ignorance or hatred, but a terrifying history.

Harrison becomes the movie’s central character far too late in the runtime, unfortunately, and we’re forced to sit through an hour of bickering just to get to him. His frighteningly deep, monotone voice wills his dialogue into the realm of something you at least want to listen to. His action-sequences are the most bone-crushing. I’d be all for a sequel with Mr. Cumberbatch as the screen time leader, or maybe could be talked into one where the characters had anything interesting to say.

Despite my belief that Star Trek: Into Darkness fights to stay average at best, the fat, suntan-less white men populating the theater ate the popcorn and this movie up. So, if you’re one of them or their fat girlfriends, waddle on down to your local cinaplex ASAP. Just be prepared for the horrific oversight of no Boba OR Jango Fett.

SCORE (Out of 10):
4
Get Lasik.
"The people walking in darkness have seen a great light" - Isaiah 9:2
By: Steve Loori
Star Trek: Into Darkness image
A cash money Enterprise

Let me start by saying that I was a huge fan of the first Star Trek film. I pretty much love everything connected to J.J. Abrams and Bad Robot (except for Super 8). Because of this, there are two ways of looking at my viewpoint going into the theatre for this movie; either I had planned to like it before even seeing it, or I had expectations that were too high. I think the latter of those two options is closer to the way it worked out. At first glance, the Star Trek: Into Darkness was set-up to be fantastic. It had a strong, well-put-together cast returning, a fanbase already installed, and the king of all nerds directing. I would not say the movie disappointed, but it definitely missed its mark a little bit – It definitely hit a good spot on the target, but was not a bullseye.

First off, the casting was outstanding. If you look at Chris Pine long enough, he looks more and more like William Shatner, the original Captain James T. Kirk. His gestures match that of his predecessor, but he makes the role his own. In this film he is able to evoke emotion better than I have ever seen him do in the past, securing him as a very strong up-and-coming star – now he just needs a better selection process when scripts find him. I was a big fan of Zachary Quinto on Heroes, and he makes Spock exactly as frustrating a character as he should be, while also humanizing him better than Leonard Nimoy ever could. Comic relief finds its way around Kirk plenty, but Simon Pegg kicks it up a notch as Scotty. Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, and Anton Yelchin all give strong supporting roles, as well as John Cho, more commonly known as “Harold”. Alice Eve looks great, but doesn’t really add much through her acting. Her role is small, though, so she does not have a negative effect on the movie either. Benedict Cumberbatch has one of the most villainous voices I have ever heard – it is Jafar-esque. He ties the movie together, as you cannot help but wonder how dark he will get. In addition to the casting, the music was exceptional, borrowing most of the score from the first film because if it’s not broken you should not fix it.

The storyline of Into Darkness was a good idea, but it got a little bit hazy at points. As much as I am a purist, I do believe that these Star Trek films are the highest points in the series. There are great things from the past that deserve to be taken and built upon, but there are also high points that need to be left alone. Before I go on a wild and defiant rant, let me just say that if I never saw Leonard Nimoy again it would be too soon. He was a standout weakness on Fringe (another Bad Robot success), as well as the worst part of the first Star Trek film. In a shocking turn of events, Nimoy is the weakest thing about Into Darkness as well. Stop living off of your fame from the 1960’s Leonard, and leave the acting to the new generation.

As I was saying, the storyline can get a little bit jumbled. Any story that deals with all of space and messes with different timelines can easily fall off of the track. This one does not necessarily fall off of the track, but it does stumble a little bit. It reminds me of what I hated about the show House – we get it Dr. House, you play by your own rules and it’s not edgy anymore so shape up like everyone else. Captain Kirk almost gets the same feeling from me in this movie. It gets hard to root for a guy who is always the victim and acts like a jerk when he does not follow orders. I understand that is what makes the character great, but it gets to be a tad over the top. I also feel that the love troubles that Spock and Uhura have seem to develop and fix themselves too quickly and easily. In addition to things being swept aside quickly, the Klingons have a part to say in Into Darkness, but they are not the tough Klingons you may have been hoping for. They are merely there to show how strong and villainous the movie’s bad guy is, but they do not provide anything beyond moving the story along. There is a hint that we will see more of the Klingons in the future but only if we fill in the blanks ourselves, as nothing concrete is shown or stated, which is rather upsetting.

The best thing that will come from this movie is a reignited interest in the Star Trek franchise for all of the nerdy, hip youth that seek out old things that were once nearly cool. I can guarantee that many who leave the theatre after seeing this film will find themselves watching Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan very soon. Interests will be developed, just as newfound Doctor Who fans find themselves watching classic episodes of the show even though the show was never as good as it has been in the modern era.

All in all, Star Trek: Into Darkness was a fine film and a joy to watch, but not a movie without holes. To be blunt and honest, it was not as good as the first movie and that holds it back. It’s good but not great, kind of like Donovan McNabb.

SCORE (Out of 10):
7
TOP